Not Just Politics: The Classist Undercurrent in Elite Hostility Toward Ruto
When William Ruto rose to power on a “hustler” narrative, many saw it as a symbol of hope for the ordinary Kenyan. But beyond the surface of political opposition lies a subtler, more insidious form of resistance—classism. While political disagreements are expected in any democracy, the intense hostility he faces from sections of Kenya’s elite seems to run deeper than policy—it hints at discomfort with his background, style, and the fact that he doesn’t fit the traditional mold of leadership.
Since assuming office, Ruto has faced sharp criticism—on economic decisions, governance style, and his public statements. But the Ruto discomfort is about more than policy. He did not rise from Kenya’s political dynasties. He represents the outsider who forced his way in, a man from humble beginnings who built a base through religious appeal and populist language. To many in Kenya’s upper-middle class, this has made him an uncomfortable presence in power.
Ruto embraces his identity—often seen quoting scripture, openly expressing his faith, and using language that resonates deeply with the common mwananchi. His warning that he would “crush” anyone trying to sabotage his presidency recently rubbed elite circles the wrong way. To them, it sounded too aggressive and unbecoming of a head of state. But for his supporters, especially those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, his persona challenges the traditional political template and is a show of strength and defiance against entrenched privilege.
It’s important to note that criticism of Ruto is not always about governance. Many of his critics raise valid points—his economic policies have had tangible impacts, and the promises made to uplift hustlers remain largely unfulfilled. However, a notable portion of the backlash often centers on superficial factors: his accent, his fashion, his style of worship—details that wouldn’t likely draw the same attention if they came from a more ‘refined’ or elite leader.
This contradiction is telling. Kenya’s elite often project progressive values—speaking of equality and democracy. But Kenya’s elite mirror their own biases when their disdain for Ruto seems rooted in cultural elitism. His presence in power disrupts an unspoken expectation of leadership being reserved for a polished, well-connected class.
Whether one supports or opposes William Ruto, it’s becoming harder to ignore the undertones behind the opposition he faces. His presidency hasn’t just shaken up the political landscape—it has rattled class comfort zones. He challenges the hierarchy of who gets to lead, speak, and be heard in Kenya. Until this tension between meritocracy and elitism is openly addressed, some of the loudest resistance to his leadership risks looking less like a call for better governance—and more like discomfort with who’s finally at the table.
Article By Suzy Nyongesa.
